NCO Association of Armed Forces (ASFAS) announced the filing, by the legal staff, two administrative appeal against the latest standards issued by the Ministry of Defense directed Carmen Chacón, more specifically against the Royal Decree 383/2011 of 18 March, approving the Regulation of Armed Forces Reservists and Instruction 10/2011 of 24 February, adopting the policy of interpersonal messaging application on the network of the Ministry of Defence.
As reported ASFAS legal director, Antonio Suárez-Valdés, can not be more aroused discontent among the junior officers of the Armed Forces, on the occasion of the promulgation of the regulations mentioned above and which affect a group that already is seriously injured because of the fluctuating regulating promotions within the Ministry of Defence, which has led to a high mobilization, which has led to the filing of more than 5000 resources, many of whom are stuck Advice on Legal Department.
Regarding the Regulation of Armed Forces Reservists, ASFAS understand that regulation of the promotions for reservists, it is offensive to the group of noncommissioned officers, to require such training Reservists well below the required a noncommissioned officer, and a much lower periods of service for promotion to the top job. As indicated by Suárez-Valdés, a reservist with 60 days of activation and limited military training, could be in a position to ascend, when an officer the same rise it could take between 8 and eleven years of service standing in the Armed Forces, in addition to specify a degree of training and expertise far superior, which falls under its own weight.
On the other hand, has recently promulgated the Instruction 10/2011 of 24 February, approving the policy on the use of emails in the network of the Ministry of Defense also ASFAS has been appealed. According to Suárez-Valdés, this instruction allows the Ministry of Defense, without any additional condition, inspection of all files and messages that are sent from the system and Lotus employee in the Ministry without prior judicial review, which, in the opinion of such counsel, constitutes a violation of the right to secrecy of communications and personal privacy, more of other types of regimes that rule of law as English. That is why what ASFAS challenged that instruction, with intention to raise its claim, if necessary, even before the European Court of Human Rights.
Proud of Our Vocation. AGBs. Blog in defense of the NCO Corps of the Army General. Spain. 
0 comments:
Post a Comment