A report by the Army recognizes the right of soldiers to join "associations protest"
ensures, however, that "professional associations" are not recognized "in the field of the Armed Forces
MADRID, 19 Oct. (EUROPA PRESS) -
A report by the Legal Department of the Headquarters of the Army recognizes the right of the military to be part of "vindictive associations" that do not cover up "a activity sindical o parasindical" y mantiene que el hecho de pertenecer a uno de estos colectivos como miembro o cargo directivo "no puede ser objeto de sanción".
El documento, avanzado hoy por el diario El Mundo y publicado este lunes en su web por la Asociación Unificada de Militares Españoles (AUME), analiza la legislación que regula el derecho de asociación de los miembros de las Fuerzas Armadas y llega a la conclusión de que la Constitución, la Ley Orgánica Reguladora del Derecho de Asociación, las Reales Ordenanzas y la doctrina del Tribunal Constitucional no excluyen a los militares de "el derecho de asociarse en asociaciones reivindicativas, en tanto no encubran una actividad sindical or parasindical.
Submitted on 4 August to the Operations Division of the General Staff of the Army, the report notes that "every soldier can freely join an association registered in the registers of national and autoonómicos associations and assume leadership roles and representative thereof. "
also says that the fact that an association may have" a component in their statutes protest "does not make unlawful the military involvement in that group and stresses that what they have banned members of the Armed Forces is part of unions, "not to be confused with associations.
note that membership of a member or office manager of an association can not be overturned, "the text to emphasize that" no military "can rely on their partnership" to avoid the application of criminal and disciplinary rules. "
Finally, the document of six pages in length, recalls that" professional associations "are not" recognized "in" the scope of the Armed Forces and those in currently associated with the military can not "enforce" their "condition" because there is no specific law that recognizes them.
therefore maintains that "no authority or control" has the "legal obligation" to give "special and differential treatment" for these military groups, who can not meet in barracks or military installations or "inform the public" within the Forces military.
0 comments:
Post a Comment